i disagree with you on the point where you say it is a necessity for a pilot to be able to leave a war dec'd corp.
here's why:
i'd like to think that any given pilot joins a corp for a reason - there's a common goal, for example.
that pilot should stay for good times and bad times.
which now generates the question: "were they loyal to the corporation or to themselves?"
if they leave, i tend to think that pilot is thinking of themselves, not the whole.
that pilot can still log in - but stay in station where it's safe or just not log in for a week.
CCP isn't effected because subs are paid monthly, quarterly, semi-annually or annually or subs are paid with plex.
the game isn't really effected either if 1 pilot doesn't log in for a week.
a true allegience to a corp would be created by not allowing pilots to leave his/her corp during a war.

let's say an alliance has 10 corps with a total of 500 pilots.
corp a (with 50 pilots) leaves the alliance. corp a takes the war with them.
corp a cannot escape the war.
why should any of the 50 pilots escape by dropping?

if said pilot(s) go to an npc corp - only the pilot(s) should be affected. not the entire npc corp.
is logical.....corp a cannot escape war. neither should any of their 50 pilots.

furthermore, think of the imbalance between the cost of a war dec vs the cost of starting a new corporation.
years ago that imbalance was slight (2 mil to dec a corp. 1.5 mil to start one). now it's huge.
one possible deterrent to corp hopping could be to raise the cost of creating a corporation from 1.5 mil to 50 mil.

You will find many corps that lure in new players, without ever telling them about wars. I have seen quite a few alphas over the last couple of days who joined corps that even had wars running at it seemed like the recruiter never mentioned anything like that.

aww the poor little griefer now can't use off grid boosting n is now complaining cause people don't want to be killed non stop by idiots so they leave the corp and you want to war dec NPC corps

Are you out of your mind?

Go play wow u noob

I have no idea where you got the impression that I was in any way mad let alone 'throwing a tantrum' or being overly emotional.

I also don't care how you respond to it
...
Real pvp pilots LIKE MYSELF pvp in low/null, we attack pilots who are trying equally as hard to kill us, what we do is RISK VS REWARD

What you do is their risk of undocking vs your reward of looting their ships

You are not mercs

I am ex REAL MC. I flew under Selenee, you, are griefers, end of story
...
Ive never died to a griefer because I am not stupid enough to join a corp in high sec

Your noobs, end of.

As I said, bitter little griefers who can't use link alts and are now getting there asses handed to them

go go

love it,

your tears on here, the hatred, the sarcasm, gives me more than enough reason to keep posting

random idea to make defenders want to defend

idea from FW
when you kill an attacker from corp who war dec'd you. you get LP based on what ship it was (like in FW)

only applies for the defenders.....as otherwise high sec gankers would just continue to war dec everyone.

good idea? maybe not....but its an idea to encourage defenders. and thus make attackers 2nd guess if they want to dec war as they don't get LP for killing, and the enemy will actually be encouraged to fight back

same way as you do in FW

the isk to LP ratio is less than the LP earned from the ship

and LP you get is based off the ship. not entirely sure the exact numbers, but it works out in the end for FW without being exploitable (bit like ship insurance and bounty payouts. what you get is less than ship's worth)

do you have anything that proves it was deliberate?

I asked for proof that they deliberately did that to penalise aggressors which is what Ima Wreckyou suggested, because it sounded from what you said and from checking that link that they programmed a delay for 24 hours initially on the ally, but changed it to four for obvious reasons, which makes my sloppy logic suggestion more likely, because they never programmed the check for the original war dec start time. Just who is looking dumb now numb-nuts, this confirms that my feeling that it was sloppy logic is more likely to be correct because with the orginal 24 delay there was no need to do that check, which does not surprise me!